121,361 Dutch companies, resolved to a website and a phone number, on your own machine
Apollo and ZoomInfo are built on people who keep a LinkedIn profile current. A large part of the Dutch operating economy does not: the working number for a 20-person installatiebedrijf in Zwolle or a Westland horticulture operator sits on their own .nl site, not in a resold contact database.
AtlasForgeX holds 121,361 Dutch companies. 52.6% resolve to a live website and 32.3% to a phone number, both extracted from the Dutch-language web rather than bought from a list vendor. Combined with a regulatory environment (UAVG, AP guidance, Telecommunicatiewet article 11.7) that is unusually friendly to function-relevant B2B email, and a client that runs locally on your Windows machine.
Free 1-day trialThe Dutch legal frame, before the data
The Netherlands is one of the friendlier European jurisdictions for legitimate-interest B2B email, but the framing matters, and the rules sit in three separate statutes.
// UAVG + AP + Telecommunicatiewet 11.7
Article 6(1)(f) GDPR (legitimate interest) is the lawful basis, implemented domestically by the UAVG (Uitvoeringswet AVG). The Autoriteit Persoonsgegevens has issued public guidance allowing outreach to professional contacts at professional addresses when the legitimate-interest balancing test is met.
Telecommunicatiewet article 11.7 governs commercial electronic communications. Under Dutch implementation, email to legal-person mailboxes does not require prior opt-in, only a clear and functioning opt-out. Email to natural-person mailboxes within a B2B context is permitted on the legitimate-interest basis where function-relevance is demonstrable.
Role mailboxes (info@, verkoop@, inkoop@) sit outside the personal-data definition entirely and therefore outside the UAVG scope.
AtlasForgeX processes every record locally on the Windows endpoint. No transfer of personal data to a third country occurs, the Schrems II question is structurally outside scope.
What you actually get for the Netherlands
Straight answer, because the trial is free and you will check anyway. The Dutch dataset is built from business listings plus live analysis of the Dutch-language web, not from a KvK Handelsregister feed. Here is the honest field-by-field state.
The geography of Dutch demand
- RANDSTADServices, finance, government-adjacent consulting, head-office concentration in Amsterdam, Rotterdam, Den Haag and Utrecht. Where the Dutch LinkedIn signal is strongest but still misses founder-led firms below 100 employees. Search by city plus a keyword such as "advies" or "software".
- BRAINPORT EINDHOVENThe Dutch hardware-tech triangle around Eindhoven, Helmond and Veldhoven. Semicon supply chain, photonics, deep-tech engineering. Heavy Dutch and English bilingual sites, which is exactly where a resolved domain beats a stale contact record.
- GREENPORT WESTLANDHorticulture and agri-tech cluster south-west of Den Haag, global leader in greenhouse production. Family-held operators with thin LinkedIn presence and rich Dutch-language web. One of the strongest phone-resolution areas in the dataset.
- ROTTERDAMMaritime, port logistics, petrochemicals around the Botlek. Operators here run lean Dutch-language sites, so the contact details tend to sit one click from the homepage.
- GRONINGEN / NORTHEnergy transition, offshore wind, hydrogen, plus historic gas-field decommissioning. Smaller deal volume but high engineering-services density.